Talk:2010 Brazilian Grand Prix/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bcschneider53 (talk · contribs) 17:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

I'll take this one. Comments to follow soon. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 17:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): {{GAList/check|}y}

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Lead

• "Jenson Button, Hamilton's teammate, was mathematically eliminated from retaining the championship" Suggest making it more clear that Button was the defending champion

Background

• "with 231 points; ahead of Red Bull's Mark Webber" think a comma is more appropriate here, or perhaps even nothing at all

Practice

• No major issues that I can see.

Qualifying

Post-qualifying

• "Kovalainen 20th and Di Grassi 21st" small d in "di Grassi."

Race

• ALT text for images might be good if you have FAC aspirations, but not a requirement here by any means.
• "Schumacher fell to tenth by driving onto the grass" was this a driver's error or was he forced onto the grass?
• "the Grand Prix's sole safety car deployment:" I'd change this to a simple period but feel free to ignore this one if you like it as is.

Post-race

• Just a note, I've boldly tweaked the captions to ensure the parentheses are non-italics, feel free to tweak further

• Refs, images look good, no dab or external link issues.

Really just some minor prose stuff here. Should be simple fixes. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

• @Bcschneider53: Have addressed all of the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 17:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
  • @MWright96: Thank you! Pass. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 18:13, 6 May 2020 (UTC)