Talk:2010 Rose Bowl

2010 Rose Bowl

• Re: "The participants in the BCS National Championship Game will partake in simular activities after the completion of the Rose Bowl Game.", You should check a little more carefully. No decisions have been made for the BCS game yet. After the Rose Bowl game? Shouldn't information, if truth, be posted at the BCS game article? The Rose Bowl teams leave town and the BCS teams move into Southern California. Members only site has all the information, including where the training facilities, not the same as the Rose Bowl or the previous years. Interestingly, some how you get such information from the East Coast. Ucla90024 (talk) 16:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Records

• Isn't the record of each team equal "the overall wins-losses (-ties if applicable) of the Visitor (or Home) team playing in the game, prior to the start of the game" as indicated in the template? But some editors keep change the records after the game. Why?? 216.175.107.228 (talk) 02:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Favorite

In reference to the small edit war over using "by" or "-" in the infobox for the favorite, I stand corrected that the template guide uses "by" as seen at Template:Infobox NCAA football yearly game. In the future, you can simply find that yourself and reference it here on the talk page or at least attempt some sort of dialogue rather than starting an edit war and accusing editors of being the same person when they clearly aren't. I have seen the "-" sign in common usage, however, so it is also acceptable. --JonRidinger (talk) 04:50, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

There is a discussion about this very issue at WT:CFB#Odds, so the usage in the template may be changed. --JonRidinger (talk) 15:03, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

See the template for correct use. 99.90.144.184 (talk) 05:54, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Odds RFC

Please see the requests for comment on the format of the odds on this discussion page. --slakr^\ talk / 01:56, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010 Rose Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081218154630/http://www.tournamentofroses.com/press/press/press_2009_teams_announced.html to http://www.tournamentofroses.com/press/press/press_2009_teams_announced.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:40, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010 Rose Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081218172130/http://www.tournamentofroses.com/rosebowlgame/game-quick-facts.asp to http://www.tournamentofroses.com/rosebowlgame/game-quick-facts.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)