Wikipedia

Talk:2010 Subway Fresh Fit 600

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Terrillja in topic Delisted GA
Learn more about this page
Former good article2010 Subway Fresh Fit 600 was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 2, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
May 4, 2010Good article nomineeListed
June 15, 2010Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 23, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Ryan Newman won the 2010 Subway Fresh Fit 600 after making a pass with only two laps to go?
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
This review is transcluded from Talk:2010 Subway Fresh Fit 600/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 23:10, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, everything seems in order. I did some copy editing. I hope you don't mind. I have just a few questions.

  • "After the restart, the race had a run of green flag laps which ended because of the seventh caution on lap 256, caused by David Reutimann." - what did he do?
  • "but because of a poor restart Kyle Busch passed him." - how is a restart "poor"?

I may add more if I come across any.

Thanks, Xtzou (Talk) 23:10, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have addressed your concerns in the article. Hopefully it's good now. ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ message • changes) 23:40, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yes, thank you. Xtzou (Talk) 23:45, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:   Pass
    B. MoS compliance:   Complies with the basic MoS
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:   Sources are reliable
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:   Well referenced
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:   Sets the context
    B. Focused:  } Remains focused on topic
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Pass!  

Nice job! Xtzou (Talk) 23:46, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Delisted GA

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As the assessment was done by a socking and essentially banned user, major issues such as prose were not adressed. There should be some element of a progression of the race, but a lap by lap recount is not proper prose. I would suggest a reassessment of this and any other articles the user reviewed once the issues are addressed, see some of the other (more thourough) reviews of other similar articles or ask me for further information. Some examples: "Jimmie Johnson led them to the flag" who is "them"? Everyone? A second group? and what made the restart "faulty"? Did a driver make a mistake? Did an official make a mistake?--Terrillja talk 05:10, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2010_Subway_Fresh_Fit_600&oldid=1196574280"