Talk:2010 United States House of Representatives elections in Arizona

Orphaned references in United States House of Representatives elections in Arizona, 2010

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of United States House of Representatives elections in Arizona, 2010's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "results":

• From Illinois gubernatorial election, 2010: "Ballots Cast". Illinois State Board of Elections. Retrieved March 5, 2010.
• From Arizona gubernatorial election, 2002: "2002 Gubernatorial General Election Results - Arizona". Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Retrieved 2008-08-10. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
• From Wyoming gubernatorial election, 2010: "Wyoming Gubernatorial Primary Results". WY SOS. August 17, 2010. Retrieved August 22, 2010. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
• From Pennsylvania's 12th congressional district special election, 2010: "2010 Special Election for the 12th Congressional District". Pennsylvania Department of State. Retrieved May 19, 2010.
• From United States presidential election in Arizona, 2008: "STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICIAL CANVASS: 2008 General Election - November 4, 2008" (PDF). Secretary of State of Arizona. 2008-12-01. Retrieved 2008-12-06.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:17, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Jesse Kelly

Suggesting merging Jesse Kelly into this article because it fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:BIO as a stand-alone article. Arbor832466 (talk) 15:42, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

I oppose merging. His run for office is one part of his life. In the future people may debate if he's notable enough to merit continued inclusion, however, as an active major party candidate in an election for the U.S. Congress he's worthy of his own article.--Utahredrock (talk) 05:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

• I agree with Utahredrock's point. And the fact that according to polling he has a real good shot at defeating an incumbent, makes him notable in and of itself. Especially in this election cycle where control of the U.S. Congress is up for grabs. -- Evans1982 (talk) 07:47, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

• Besides, if he's elected in three weeks, it won't matter. He'll definitely be notable at that point and we'll need the separate article about him. --SchutteGod (talk) 17:18, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

I agree with SchutteGod. The article is good enough to leave until after the election, at which point we can re-open discussion if he loses. Flatterworld (talk) 16:03, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Paul Gosar

I've proposed merging Paul Gosar because Mr. Gosar doesn't seem to meet the criteria of WP:POLITICIAN or WP:BIO. Simply running ahead in partisan polls does not qualify him for his own article, although that information should certainly be included this page. Thanks! Arbor832466 (talk) 15:37, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Why are you making all these challenges so close to the election? I mean, if it was still five months out, I could understand it, but three weeks? This guy could get elected, and we'd need to change it right back to give him his own article. U.S. congressmen and congressmen-elect are notable bio subjects. Opposed, though I do favor revisiting this request should Gosar lose. --SchutteGod (talk) 17:22, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

I agree with SchutteGod. The article is good enough to leave until after the election, at which point we can re-open discussion if he loses. Flatterworld (talk) 16:04, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Flag of Phoenix, Arizona.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Flag of Phoenix, Arizona.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on United States House of Representatives elections in Arizona, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20101028234534/http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=ratings-house to http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=ratings-house
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130920230737/http://azsos.gov/election/2010/General/Canvass2010GE.pdf to http://www.azsos.gov/election/2010/General/Canvass2010GE.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)