Talk:2010 Vermont gubernatorial election

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

The progressive party is a major party in VT and thus the candidate from this party should be listed as a major section rather than in the minor party/independent section. http://vermont-elections.org/elections1/candidates.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.69.30.75 (talk) 05:12, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Dennis Steele

edit

I've removed any references to Second Vermont Republic (SVR) as a political "third" party in Vermont since it is not registered as one. Editor 71.22.221.210 had identified Steele as a SVR party member, not independent, and linked to his campaign website; the website merely indicates that "Dennis (Steele) has been an active supporter of the Second Vermont Republic and the entire Vermont independence movement," not a member of a putative SVR Party. He may also be a AAA supporter or a member of AARP or an Elk but neither are they parties and so would be equally irrelevant to a party label designation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TR05401 (talkcontribs) 01:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vermont gubernatorial election, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply