Talk:2010 Zahedan bombings

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Page move

edit

This page and 2010 Zahedan mosque bombings were created at roughly the same time and thus overlapped. I moved the info to the bigger page, the other page maybe a better move? Does anyone have a word on that?Lihaas (talk) 05:09, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

either article is OK. would prefer to include Mosque in the title though for ease of searching.--Wikireader41 (talk) 04:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yep, i though that too. Let's wait and see if there are comments to this message in the next few days, if not we can move it?Lihaas (talk) 10:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

"Reaction" section of article

edit

There is absolutely no reason to add US propaganda to this article. If you must: 1. Keep it brief so that US denials or declarations do not overwhelm the material presented in this article. 2. Balance it with the declarations from other leaders particularly those that see US without a neutral viewpoint on this subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.80.241.154 (talk) 22:37, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

It is a referenced statement which is germane to the subject. Replacing it with the words "denying support" removes context and severely skews meaning. The article already contains a statement by Iran's deputy interior minister. Removing the US portion from the article because you feel it is "propaganda" is simply a POV edit. Taroaldo (talk) 23:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Youre free to add other statement to the contrary provided they are sourced. Both US denials and Iranian accusation are a matter of [sourced] fact.Lihaas (talk) 01:19, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
I dont see any US 'propaganda' in the article. Clintons statements are very important especially considering current US-Iran tensions. of course reactions of other prominent world leaders (for example Saudi King and other Arab Sunni leaders) would be welcome.--Wikireader41 (talk) 03:58, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

aftermath section

edit

does anyone think its warranted? Ie- the MP resignation and possible repercussions/crackdowns/other attacks.Lihaas (talk) 10:42, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2010 Zahedan bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:05, 21 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2010 Zahedan bombings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply