Talk:2011 BMC Racing Team season/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 21:14, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:16, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:16, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Prose is good, there is a tendency to overuse the word "like". I made a couple of copy-edits. Complies with major MoS standards.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    References support statements, sources are RS, no OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Good broad coverage
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Images licensed and captions
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Another well written season summary. Passing as GA. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:36, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.