Wikipedia

Talk:2011 Canadian census

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Wikiproject proposal

edit

I have proposed a Wikiproject for the 2011 census of Canada. Click here I would like to see all census geographic units of Canada found in that census to be added including a uniform appearance to each page.

Controversy section

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've made some changes and suggest that we avoid statements of opinion as fact. I changed a line saying "the data collected will be less accurate" to "industry professionals judge the data will be less accurate". This sort of statement can then be cited with supporting evidence. I'll be trying to review the citations and add some that I've been collecting --Chris Latour (talk) 11:27, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Advice?

edit

We have an apparent contradiction between Clement's statement re StatsCan advice and Sheikh's resignation/statement. This offers a possible resolution between both sets of statements, but is not an acceptable cite. Can we find a better one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.112.29.245 (talk) 18:06, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Major changes

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

So I'm finally getting around to reviewing this page and find that it needs a major rewrite. Here is my reasons for some of the changes;

Opening section

edit

Much of this text needs to be moved to other sections. Statements of fact are given without citations. I'd like to see some of the lines I removed return but only if they can be properly supported; 

Since 1971, the census included a short form mailed to originally to 66 percent but recently to 80 per cent of Canadian households, and a longer, more detailed form mailed to the remaining households.

If it's 'since 1971' then you can't really list two percentages. The date range should be given for each percentage shown and the facts should be supported. 

In deciding questions for the both the short form and long form questionnaires, Statistics Canada consulted and collected comments from government, organizations, and individuals across Canada.

I'd like to keep this by there is no citation and a clearer definition of "organizations" is needed. What kind of orgainsations? Industries that use the data? Data Collection experts? I've replaced it with a line from further down about the questions being the same. 

Controversially, the Conservative government eliminated the detailed...

(see the history if you want the full thing).

This whole section has to go. It was either a repeat of what was being said above or of what was below in the controversy section. It also had errors such as saying the change was made through legislation (it was and "Order in Council"[1]).

There was some good info with citations about the questions on both forms, I have transfered this to the Questionnaire section, that seemed to match the current intended layout.

In rewriting the opening section, my goal was to keep everything based on facts and transfer anything relating to the controversy to the appropriate section.--Chris Latour (talk) 15:59, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Questionnaire section

edit

After adding the facts from the opening section, I thought it the comments about accuracy of data belonged here as they are about the questionaire. I added lots of citations but kept the details small so that the discussion remains focused on the controversy section.

As there is now information on multiple questionnaires I have created subsections.--Chris Latour (talk) 15:59, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Controversy section

edit

I'll have to touch this another day...--Chris Latour (talk) 15:59, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "Canada Gazette > Part I: Notices and Proposed Regulations > 2010-08-21".

court case

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I thought there was a court case relating to this - of francophone minority groups? Anyone know anything further? Funding is related to census data - which is how that mobilisation came about. I remember hearing about it on the radio — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.189.236.6 (talk) 21:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Canada 2011 Census. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:12, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Canada 2011 Census. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Canada 2011 Census. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Canada 2011 Census. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Canada 2011 Census. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2011_Canadian_census&oldid=1214685815"