Talk:2011 Tirreno–Adriatico

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2011 Tirreno–Adriatico/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 00:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:57, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Prose good, organization good. I made a few minor copy-edits. Complies sufficiently with key MoS elements. I note US English spelling, you might wish to put Template:American English on the talk page.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References appear RS, support the cited statements, no evidence of OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Sufficient detail without unnecessary trivia.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Captioned and licensed OK

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I have no hesitation in passing this as a good artcile. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:21, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2011 Tirreno–Adriatico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110318172554/http://www.cyclingnews.com/races/46th-tirreno-adriatico-his/stage-7/results to http://www.cyclingnews.com/races/46th-tirreno-adriatico-his/stage-7/results

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

GA concerns

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria due to the vast amount of uncited text in the article, including entire paragraphs. Is anyone interested in addressing this concern, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 00:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)