Talk:2012–13 La Liga

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Spanish football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

How to deal with postponed matches in the positions-by-round table

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In order to ressolve the current content dispute, I have a) added some text prior to the table similar to the one 2012–13 Fußball-Bundesliga#Positions by round and b) removed AllTimeSoccer.com as a source. The reasons behind that are the incompatibility of ATS.com as a source because it lists matches per calendar day, not per round, and the general lack of information how postponed matches are included into the table. These moves also make the table compliant with WP:V and remove any problems with WP:OR as well. I hope these moves are meeting the consensus of the community; if not, feel free to discuss alternative ideas. --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 12:40, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

You can't take a final decision for any dispute of this content without consensus. It's known your rejection of the table of "Positions by round". Positions by round had always been a table about the definitive and assured positions by round for each team, never a chronological table, althought it could be no chronological the table must reflect the positions of the matches corresponding for these rounds, althought there have been matches out of the original date. If other leagues it's more usual to relocate matches from the original date per matchday, it cannot make a precedent for the Spanish league which it had always been for these rules. There's no dispute, there are a clear rules for the meaning of this table. You cannot change the meaning of this table for your perception, you prefer a table which reflects a chronological order, so this cannot be named "Positions by round". I will made the corresponding changes to not confuse the understanding of this table by a lot of people. A solution which make you most happy is that you create an alternative "positions by week" table, so its the meaning you're agree, you always have been against the table positions by round which is in this wikipedia since 4 years ago at least, with a clear rules that you can't accept. Sorry for my bad english. - tot-futbol (talk) 13:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Zamora Trophy: Too much

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In order to keep a more accurate list of the "Zamora Trophy" is necessary include only those goalkeepers who have played the 75% of the rounds played.

The Zamora Trophy's rule number one says: "For a goalkeeper to be eligible for the trophy he should play at least 28 games, considered calculable, during the league season. For a match to be considered calculable the goalkeeper should play, at least, 60 minutes of said match."

Thus, the list must show those who are eligible to win the trophy. That is, those who play the above-mentioned percentage, the required 28 games correspond to 73% (this figure could be rounded to 75%) of the total of 38 games played in a season. For example: at the 10th round should be shown only those who have 8 played games. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndresSuescun (talk • contribs) 01:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

In a few rounds some of these players are going to be removed because they wont be able to play at least 28 games. At the half of the season the list will have probably only 20 players. Id prefer to let only the best 10 ratios than excluding keepers with less matches. Im updating this section every week and i think its the easiest way --Mtrz (talk) 01:37, 31 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Number of Assists for Mesut Ozil

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

According to goal.com Ozil has 15 assists, What is the official source for assists? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.207.46.162 (talk) 13:10, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2012–13 La Liga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 3 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on 2012–13 La Liga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nike advertisement?

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why does Nike feature so prominently? I’ve skimmed through a few different seasons, and the ball never gets mentioned, at least not in the first paragraph.

I’d argue to delete or move this bit somewhere else, but I’m not entirely sure where to. 2A02:8109:AB9B:FB00:B1C4:33E3:C987:7EB4 (talk) 21:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic