Talk:2012 New Hampshire Democratic primary

United States: New Hampshire / Presidential elections Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This redirect is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections.

Elections and Referendums

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Ron Paul

Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Considering that votes for him didn't count, as he was not an eligible write-in candidate... I'm not sure how valid listing him as the 2nd place finisher is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.145.76.243 (talk) 08:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Could you provide a link or other source that says that they don't count? I can see, logically, what that would be the case, but "logically" doesn't mean "according to Democratic Party rules" or "according to state law". If you can provide a link, that would also be useful to have in the article. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 15:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Indeed, a reliable source to support the assertion that the write-in votes are invalid would not only be useful, but necessary per WP:V.--JayJasper (talk) 20:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's indeed possible that NONE of the votes count, as delegates are elected seperately and the popular vote is just a glorified straw pollEricl (talk) 19:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

For which, again, a source would be very helpful. I'm not arguing with you as to what you say (I know that was true in Iowa, from reading news articles), but rather noting that the information in Wikipedia articles should come from reliable sources, not from what people think - without quoting a source - is true. -- John Broughton (♫♫)

Add topic