Talk:2012 Paris–Nice

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Disc Wheel in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:2012 Paris–Nice/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Disc Wheel (talk · contribs) 00:49, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Will get to this in a few hours or so. Disc Wheel (Talk + Tontributions) 00:49, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

This was well written, references are solid, and images check out. Great work. Pass. Disc Wheel (Talk + Tontributions) 03:25, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply