Talk:2012 Safeway Championship
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Earl Andrew in topic Reason why I chose this infobox
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reason why I chose this infobox
editI realise there is already a curling event infobox but I find that this is more useful at the Manitoba level as the infobox quickly reveals who the top 3 teams were and to see that evolve over time. The curling box only lists the evolution of the winning team, which I think is constraining. As always though, this is Wikipedia, and everything is open to debate. Krazytea(talk) 22:05, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Personally, I think that we should stay with one template for curling events, but I would say that modifying the current template to include more information is also an option to be considered. Prayerfortheworld (talk) 00:55, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- Consistency is important, so I would change it to the proper infobox. But, I don't care that much really. However, I would try and put the event logo in there, at least. -- Earl Andrew - talk 16:37, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- I can try to upload the logo, are those still considered free release? As for the infobox at minimum we need to add the previous year, next year boxes. I guess it is not that bad if we have the finalist listed at least, though I would prefer to see who the semi-finalist/third place was as well. Krazytea(talk) 17:19, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- There's a certain copyright logos fall under. Look for another curling event logo and use its copyright. -- Earl Andrew - talk 18:09, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- I can try to upload the logo, are those still considered free release? As for the infobox at minimum we need to add the previous year, next year boxes. I guess it is not that bad if we have the finalist listed at least, though I would prefer to see who the semi-finalist/third place was as well. Krazytea(talk) 17:19, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- Consistency is important, so I would change it to the proper infobox. But, I don't care that much really. However, I would try and put the event logo in there, at least. -- Earl Andrew - talk 16:37, 2 February 2012 (UTC)