Talk:2012 Summer Paralympics/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Hawkeye7 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 21:14, 21 April 2014 (UTC) I will be reviewing this article. On the face of it, it will need some work in order to pass. Please allow a day or two for me to post comments. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:14, 21 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    See below
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    See below
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
Controversies
  • A little embarrassed that a controversy that we started gets so much. You should also add the one about the medal that was taken away after the handicap was re-calculated.
  Done, assuming you mean Mariia Pomazan - EronTalk 19:02, 22 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
References
  • FN 1 has a raw URL
  • FN 2 is broken
  • FN 11 is broken
  • FN 19 is broken
  • FN 21 is broken
  • FN 52 has a raw URL (Site also appears to be virus infected)
  • FN 57 publisher? access date?
  • FN 58 publisher? access date?
  • FN 65 has a raw URL
  • FN 66 is broken
  • FN 92 is broken
  • FN 93 is broken
  DoneAll the above references have been reviewed and fixed - EronTalk 20:49, 22 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
External links
  • First one is broken
  Done - EronTalk 18:39, 22 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:21, 22 April 2014 (UTC) ( A few fixes is all we need. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:57, 22 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Done - EronTalk 19:16, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Passing article. Well done. I note in passing that Sir Phillip Craven's comments about media coverage (in the controversies section) were in response to questions at a press conference from Wikipedia reporters. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply