Talk:2012 United States Senate election in Connecticut
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Residency & Potential
editEvidently Keith Olbermann is not a "potential candidate" as he does not presently reside in CT. At this point in the 2000 senate cycle Hillary Clinton did not live in NY State IIRC. Since obtaining a residence is quickly accomplished and there are no legal time barriers to a candidate relocating prior to an election, why is this a relevant concern? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.128.8 (talk) 04:55, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
- If it's uncited (and it is so far as I can see from any news outlet there is no actual announcement or mention of consideration) that he wants to run for the office, it's deletable anyway. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 16:31, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on United States Senate election in Connecticut, 2012. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100527144033/http://www.ct.gov:80/sots/cwp/view.asp?a=3&q=415810 to http://www.ct.gov/sots/cwp/view.asp?a=3&q=415810
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)