Talk:2012 West Virginia elections

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States: West Virginia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	West Virginia portal This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia (assessed as Low-importance).

Attorney General

In the Attorney General Section it states that Darrell McGraw barely won re-election due to the Chamber of Commerce's campaign against him, can this please be changed, due to the inherent bias of the statement. Voter dissatisfaction, corruption, and a very formidable candidate in Dan Greear had a lot to do with the narrowness of his victory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.125.251.25 (talk • contribs) 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Cleanup

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I did some minor cleanup on the article, and pointed out the paragraphs that badly need in-line citations. I removed the wording about McGraw's "Voter dissatisfaction, corruption, and a very formidable candidate in Dan Greear had a lot to do with the narrowness of his victory" since it represents an unsourced, negative opinion about a living person. Overall, there is way too much speculation and opinion in the article...careful in-line citation would reduce this a great deal. Cheers! Cmichael (talk) 04:57, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic