Talk:2013–14 Norwich City F.C. season/GA1
Latest comment: 10 years ago by NickGibson3900 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: NickGibson3900 (Talk - Cont.) 07:16, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
I will review shortly NickGibson3900 (Talk - Cont.) 07:16, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a) (reference section): b) (citations to reliable sources): c) (OR):
- a) (reference section): b) (citations to reliable sources): c) (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a) (major aspects): b) (focused):
- a) (major aspects): b) (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: I am putting this on hold due to a small number of fixes needed to be done that i'll list shortly NickGibson3900 (Talk - Cont.) 08:05, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Minor Issues:
- Ref 1, 2 & 133 are dead links
- Please put a key showing what "Apps" and "Pos" means, because they ,especially the first one, is hard to understand for people who don't normally these types of articles.
Once both are done i will pass this article. :) NickGibson3900 (Talk - Cont.) 09:04, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Done => Spudgfsh (Text Me!) 13:47, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
- Passing this article now GA. Well done NickGibson3900 (Talk - Cont.) 06:31, 19 July 2014 (UTC)