Talk:2013 Aberdeen Donside by-election
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editCan someone add this into the table of results? Regional votes from the constituencies, some constituencies have this included, interesting to see UKIP etc support.
Party/Candidate Description Number of votes All Scotland Pensioners 544 Angus Independent Representatives 6 British National Party 177 Christian Party "Proclaiming Christ's Lordship" 210 Scottish Conservative Party 2,076 Scottish Green Party 683 Scottish Labour Party 6,237 Scottish Liberal Democrats 1,390 Scottish National Front 135 Scottish National Party 14,526 Scottish Socialist Party 220 Socialist Labour Party 231 Solidarity - Scotland's Socialist Movement 17 UK Independence Party (UKIP) 217 Cox, John 38 Henderson, David Page 77 McBride, Andrew Fergus 8 Total valid votes 26,792
- Done. I'd be grateful if someone checked the numbers though. MoreofaGlorifiedPond,Really... (talk) 18:54, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aberdeen Donside by-election, 2013. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.newsnetscotland.com/index.php/scottish-politics/7399-nine-candidates-to-contest-aberdeen-byelection - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130724051718/http://www.aberdeencity.gov.uk/council_government/councillors/elections_unit/elections/election_2011/regional_votes.asp to http://www.aberdeencity.gov.uk/council_government/councillors/elections_unit/elections/election_2011/regional_votes.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC)