Talk:2013 Brasil Tennis Cup

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Two identical articles

edit

There are 2 identical articles about this Championship: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brasil_Tennis_Cup and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Brasil_Tennis_Cup MarcosPassos (talk) 21:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

The two articles are not quite the same; 2013 Brasil Tennis Cup has a good deal more information (and references). If you think Brasil Tennis Cup is redundant, you can list it for deletion. —Darkwind (talk) 23:32, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, they both talk about the exact same tourment. I called you because you were the one who had authorized the creation of the redundant article. Thanks, anyway. MarcosPassos (talk) 23:39, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2013 Brasil Tennis Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:46, 24 September 2016 (UTC)Reply