Wikipedia

Talk:2013 FIA World Endurance Championship

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

Designation of the factory Porsches in GTE-Pro

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2013_24_Hours_of_Le_Mans Vikirad (talk) 09:57, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Trophy for Private LMP1 Teams

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I don't understand why we should leave the table out. We already have a table for only 2 LMP1 manufacturers. Since there have been a lot of tables in the page, it makes no sense to save space by leaving out a short table.Icelan (talk) 01:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

I agree that it should be shown. I was reviewing all the standings today and was wondering where it was. It may only be a stubby table but it's still as equal a trophy as the rest. If Toyota hadn't scored at Silverstone would we be excluding the World Manufacturers table? Aheyfromhome (talk) 12:07, 18 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
The Manufacturers is a top tier World Championship. The LMP1 Privateers is a third tier FIA Trophy. There are currently 15 charts in the article, up three from last season. It is much too heavy on charts as it is now in comparison to prose. Some consideration has to be given to article size and weight. I included the Manufacturers Championship because, at the time, the FIA PDF initially listed it as being scored by all four cars, instead of the top two cars, but has since been amended. It is also the same reason I have not listed every driver who has scored points, instead limiting the drivers charts to the Top 10 and Top 5 respectively. We simply cannot fit every single statistic and points score for a series this big. The359 (Talk) 17:38, 18 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

New Entries counted in Classification

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

I just thought I'd point out that http://www.fiawec.com/courses/classification.html are reporting the new entries, such as the 98 Aston Martin, as being ranked in the full-season tables. I don't know whether thats' an error by a website editor or whether it's actually the case (contrary to what I understood), but I thought I'd point it out here for whomever it may concern. Aheyfromhome (talk) 12:05, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

I noticed it as well and I'm under the assumption that it is in error. Both cases list the cars as not participating in the previous rounds, which is incorrect, and it makes no real sense to start scoring them halfway through the season. If they continue to score them after Circuit of the Americas however, I will add them to the charts. The359 (Talk) 16:36, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
Just for formalities considering that we're deviating from the event's own website, the relevant articles of the Sporting Regulations that I can find are Article 16 f) + h), Article 21 d) e) and f), and Article 39 b). Unfortunately the website rather lets itself down by also having the 2012 version on their own Regulations page. Aheyfromhome (talk) 17:33, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
The FIA has all the 2013 documents. The359 (Talk) 20:31, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
But that's... OK. That was supposed to be my first link but somehow I posted the same one twice. What a muppet I am. Aheyfromhome (talk) 22:57, 4 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

GT Manufacturers Points

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I've just noticed another possible contradiction in the standings as shown by the WEC. It concerns the World Cup for GT Manufacturers and which cars are eligible. The points are thus:

In the Spa race the non-full-season Aston Martin #98 finished second, but because it's a non-full-season entry it gets ignored and so Ferrari get a 1-2 result and all the other places are given out appropriately. This seems to be logical and goes along with Article 20 A a) of the sporting regs.
At Sao Paulo the Aston Martin #98 gets pole, but this counts for the GT Manufacturer points.

I interpret the rules as meaning that the #98 pole shouldn't count, specifically looking at 21 D c). It seems to me that the WEC website might be wrong on the point. Anyone got thoughts? Aheyfromhome (talk) 20:24, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

ADDENDUM I've just noticed that the #98 got pole at Spa too but this is discounted by the WEC site stats. So given this precedent, I move to change the pole point for Sao Paulo from Aston Martin to Porsche and take the WEC site as being inaccurate. Aheyfromhome (talk) 21:01, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
I think it is worth waiting until after COTA to see how the #98 is scored for this race, to see if it is indeed being counted as a full season entry now or if it is a mistake. The359 (Talk) 23:46, 18 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2013 FIA World Endurance Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 25 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 2013 FIA World Endurance Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2013_FIA_World_Endurance_Championship&oldid=1211091665"