This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
...has written back to me, consenting to releasing the image on a requisite free license suitable for Commons. I will install it when he does change the license. --Mareklugtalk07:55, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
Pending the license change. I've linked to an existing Wikimedia Commons photo of a Turbo Otter, which better represents the appearance of the incident aircraft than the stock radial engine version. I also sifted through the Keith B Pics photostream on Flickr.com until I found the specific link to the image, which offers all the available sizes. The biggest size is 500 x 357 pixels, most likely not the original camera image. The photographer's Flickr.com page is a mess, with no sets, galleries or albums, just one big heap of nearly 2,900 photos. — QuicksilverT@13:52, 8 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
The photographer just informed me via FlickrMail that he declines to provide a high resolution image under the free license, as he is still interested in selling that. He says the low resolution image should suffice for printing needs, and if anyone is interested in the high resolution image, to contact him (presumably via Flickr). --Mareklugtalk07:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
