This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I know that there is a citation, but the comment, "China experienced heavy rainfall affecting 20 provinces and roughly 6 million people" doesn't make much sense. There are 34 provinces in Chila and over a billion people. Geographically, we are talking about 60% of the provinces being affected, but not even a single percentage of the population? It would be like saying that 30 states are affected, but only a million Americans. I didn't put the dubious tag there, but I agree with whoever did.21:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC) — Preceding [Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned] comment added by 74.124.47.10 (talk)
Presumably the source means had their lives disrupted is a significant way - obviously a lot more people were rained on. I have changed the wording accordingly. --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:28, 12 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
