Talk:2014 Algerian Air Force C-130 crash

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2014 Algerian Air Force C-130 crash article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Algeria Low‑importance

	Algeria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Algeria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Algeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AlgeriaWikipedia:WikiProject AlgeriaTemplate:WikiProject AlgeriaAlgeria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Accidents Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / African / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	African military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Death toll

Latest comment: 10 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

I just saw that the info-box say there were 78 passengers and 77 deaths (I remember the infobox said 102 deaths), but there are still conflicting reports about the death toll, some saying 77 and some saying 102 or something. Can some confirm which one is correct?

Thanks. Sam.gov (talk) 21:48, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

The BBC clarifies with "The government and military say 78 people were on board - not 103 as reported by officials and local media." As it refutes and explains the earlier figure, it seems more reliable right now [1] Leondz (talk) 22:19, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the update. I guess it will be kept at 78. Sam.gov (talk) 22:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

It says now 76 bodies were revoverd and there was 1 survivor.Lihaas (talk) 17:56, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Though 76 would be less awful news, I still see 78 on board / one survivor via that source ("Last updated at 21:22 GMT") Leondz (talk) 18:07, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Recovery operations completed, and the number I keep seeing is 77 + one survivor (in coma). [2] --PLNR (talk) 03:55, 14 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic