Talk:2014 Katanga train derailment
 | A news item involving 2014 Katanga train derailment was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 24 April 2014. |  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in the Democratic Republic of the Congo may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Location
editSome news sources give the location as near Katongola 8°23′30″S 24°39′49″E / 8.39167°S 24.66361°E, itself near Kamina. This is over 360 km away from Likasi. What's the correct location? Abductive (reasoning) 02:05, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. Likasi is south of Kamina, but the accident was north of Kamina, near the Katongola Bridge. I will correct the article.Ekem (talk) 14:02, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Time of derailment
editThe article says, "Between 10:00 and 11:00 local time (11:00-12:00 UTC)", but eastern DRC is on Central Africa Time, which is UTC+02:00 year-round. So if the accident happened between 10:00 and 11:00 local time, it was 8:00-9:00 UTC. And if it happened between 11:00 and 12:00 UTC, then it was 13:00-14:00 local time. Which is right? Angr (talk) 07:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- I see that the BBC news link in the article says "between 10:00 and 11:00 local time (09:00 and 10:00 GMT)", which makes sense if by "GMT" they mean British Summer Time, so I'm changing the UTC time. Angr (talk) 07:54, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Route knowledge and speed boards
editSpeed around sharp curves can be controlled by:
- driver's knowledge of the route.
- speed boards advising drivers of the lower speed limit at or approaching the sharp curve
- some kind of ATP system that regulates the train speed automatically.
Which of these apply in DRCongo? Tabletop (talk) 08:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
- Given the poor state of the infrastructure there, I suspect the first of those is all they have. Angr (talk) 16:04, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Apparent contradiction
editThe death toll is listed as 48 in the lead but 63 in the infobox. Which is correct? —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 12:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)