Talk:2014 Monaco Grand Prix

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Zwerg Nase in topic GA Review
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 7 external links on 2014 Monaco Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:2014 Monaco Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 13:55, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Review will follow shortly. Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:55, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

I just realized that I completely forgot about this review... will give it very soon, so sorry! Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Zwerg Nase: Still haven't heard anything regarding this review. Is everything alright? I understand fully if real life commitments are taking priority. MWright96 (talk) 20:20, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

I am unbelievable sorry this took so long, the past few weeks have been crazy RL-wise. Here we go now:

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

What needs to be done:

Overall, a very well written article with just those minor points to adress. I have made some minor changes myself were I felt they were needed. I will try to do the other review today as well, tomorrow the latest. Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:44, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Alrighty, I can pass this now. Congrats! Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:00, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply