Talk:2014 Sri Lanka Cricket Super 4's T20
Latest comment: 3 years ago by BegbertBiggs in topic Requested move 18 October 2020
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 18 October 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to 2014 Sri Lanka Cricket Super 4's T20 (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 16:50, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
2014 Super 4's T20 → Sri Lanka Cricket Super Four T20 2014 – I don't know what was going on with these Sri-Lanka T20's at this point. Anyway, the sources [1] on the page seem to call the tournament Sri Lanka Super Four T20 or Sri Lanka Cricket Super Four T20 and so does cricinfo [2] who gives the non sponsored 2013 version that name. Cricinfo also uses that name on the results page on the tournament here [3]. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong because I very well could be. CreativeNorth (talk) 14:15, 18 October 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. Iffy★Chat -- 19:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note I have fixed the RM to match what I believe to be the intent of the nominator at the same time as this relist. Iffy★Chat -- 19:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Whatever name is agreed, it should have the year first, then the name of the tournament, as per the convention for all cricket tours and tournaments. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:01, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Lugnuts: So would you suggest 2014 Sri Lanka Cricket Super 4's T20 as an alternative title then. Also thanks for informing about the conventions. CreativeNorth (talk) 14:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I'd support that. Thanks! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 14:55, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.