Talk:2014 United States Senate election in Iowa
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Polling Order
editWhy change it? It has always been newest to oldest. (with the exception of Massachusetts where a few people police the pages to enforce their own agenda.) See the (lengthy) arguments here.>> Talk:United States Senate election in Massachusetts, 2012#Polling order
The results of that discussion was basically nothing. We let them "rule" "their" article, and everyone else just left. Light-jet pilot (talk) 16:57, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Polling sections need to be updated
editThe polling sections for the Democratic primary, the Republican primary, and the general election all need to be updated to reflect the latest developments.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on United States Senate election in Iowa, 2014. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140502033153/http://www.timesrepublican.com/page/content.detail/id/497296/Correction--Republican-Women-Ernst-story.html?isap=1&nav=5013 to http://www.timesrepublican.com/page/content.detail/id/497296/Correction--Republican-Women-Ernst-story.html?isap=1&nav=5013
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)