Talk:2015–16 Football League Two
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of 2014–15 Football League Two was copied or moved into 2015–16 Football League Two with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Attribution
editThis page seems to have been made by copying content from elsewhere in Wikipedia (that's why the bot flagged it as a copyvio). But there's no attribution of the source, as our licence requires. Celticbhoy97, would you kindly either provide the attribution ({{Copied}} is a handy way of doing that), or say where this content originated so that someone else can do it for you? Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:29, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Since Celticbhoy97 has steadfastly ignored all requests to reveal where he copied this page from, I've now provided attribution based on what seems to be the most probable source. If that turns out to be incorrect, the source should be corrected both here and at Talk:2014–15 Football League Two. Spudgfsh, please do not remove maintenance tags without addressing the problem – that does not help the encyclopaedia (especially when you are wrong). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Please calm down, Justlettersandnumbers. I've literally only noticed this message. I'm clearly not as familiar as you are with Wikipedia. Yes, the source is right, but maybe I shouldn't be using Wikipedia if I can't understand about the licence. I apologise, but you have to understand I only created that article with good intentions. Celticbhoy97 (talk) 00:33, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
- Fair enough, Celticbhoy97, the ping system is not infallible (I didn't get yours here). I also posted – twice – on your talk page, at User talk:Celticbhoy97#Copying within Wikipedia, and got no response there either. Anyway, the main thing is that this minor matter is now resolved; thank you for confirming my guess. For the future, if you should again happen to make a new article based on an existing one, it is enough to say so in your edit summary (e.g., "new article, partly copied from previous year"). Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 07:34, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Okay. I will take note of that should anything similar arise in the future. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers. Celticbhoy97 (talk) 22:17, 18 May 2015 (UTC)