Talk:2015–16 ISU World Standings

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Figure Skating, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of figure skating-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Figure SkatingWikipedia:WikiProject Figure SkatingTemplate:WikiProject Figure SkatingFigure skating articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Section sizes

Section size for 2015–16 ISU World Standings (14 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	2,478	2,478
World Standings for single & pair skating and ice dance	62	298,044
Season-end standings	228	297,982
Men's singles (218 skaters)	91,067	91,067
Ladies' singles (243 skaters)	101,101	101,101
Pairs (96 couples)	43,051	43,051
Ice dance (140 couples)	62,535	62,535
World standings for synchronized skating	47	46,275
Season-end standings	165	46,228
Senior Synchronized (49 teams)	19,483	19,483
Junior Synchronized (67 teams)	26,580	26,580
See also	262	262
References	1,889	1,889
External links	682	682
Total	349,630	349,630

Page size

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This page currently has 450,730 bytes of wiki-code. What's the best way to split it? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 00:29, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

My inital thought would be probably to go via the category. Basically have seperate articles for Men's Singles, Ladie's Singles, Pairs and Ice Dance. HawkAussie (talk) 00:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

I've split one of these articles before and I would have intended to split the rest of these the same way. I don't have any preference on the splitting method in principle but I think they should be consistent. Onetwothreeip (talk) 10:07, 7 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic