Talk:2015 Chicago Bears season/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 20:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  20:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   It would be good if the lead could mention what months the season took place in

   I done some minor cleaning in the Front office section

   Too many red links in the body. It wouldn't hurt cutting down a few

   The Undrafted free agents section could do with being split into two paragraphs, to improve prose flow

   " Tennessee Titans vice president of player personnel" - Tennessee Titans' vice president of player personnel

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No original research found.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Overall the prose is well written and the article is definitely comprehensive enough to meet the criteria, so I'll pass this now. JAGUAR  10:44, 21 April 2016 (UTC)