Talk:2015 Giro d'Italia/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Zwerg Nase in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 16:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply


Glad to review this. Expect my reviews around Tuesday/Wednesday :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

I changed Sanremo to San Remo to make it consistent with the mention of Milan - San Remo in the article. I hope that's OK. Things that should be looked into:

  • Lead: It might be worth mentioning that Contador won the Giro without winning a stage. Maybe you can also find instances where others did the same and note that in the Race Overview section?
  • Lead: Also worth mentioning that Nizzolo won the points classification without winning a stage.
  • Teams: Any chance that a source mentioned the fact that Cofidis wasn't invited? After all, I find that pretty significant considering they were a major WorldTour Team for years...
  • Pre-race favorites: Optional: I find the image of Contador there now to be not ideal, since you cannot see his face. Maybe one from the 2011 Giro would be better, even if he was stripped from that title? After all, he was also driving for his current team back then.
  • Pre-race favorites: You should explain why Froome and Nibali are significant enough to be mentioned.

That's it really. Good job so far! Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Zwerg Nase, for your review and edits. I'm a bit in two minds about Sanremo, but I've no objection to "San Remo". Wikipedia isn't consistent on the question. I've replied to your other points above: do take a look and see if you're satisfied! Relentlessly (talk) 12:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
All done, another pass, congrats :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:03, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply