Talk:2015 La Flèche Wallonne

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Zwerg Nase in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 La Flèche Wallonne/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 10:48, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply


On it! Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:48, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Again, here just minor things:

  • As with the Amstel Gold Race, you should move the citations out of the lead.
  • Pre-race favourites: You should give Kwiatkowskis team.
  • Final loops around Huy: You take the information that Gilbert looked sore from the source. I would say, that that is too much POV on the author's part and should probably taken out.
  • Race finale: Same goes for the assertion that the break didn't have a chance at 12 km to go. That is mere speculation on the author's part and should not go into the article. I'm sure you can phrase it more neutral.
  • Same as with Amstel Gold race, you should add a row with a source at the bottom of the UCI standings table.

That's about it :) Seven days on hold, I'm sure we'll be done a lot earlier! Zwerg Nase (talk) 17:27, 5 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review, Zwerg Nase. All done, I think. Relentlessly (talk) 21:04, 5 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Wonderful, it's a pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)Reply