Talk:2015 La Flèche Wallonne
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Zwerg Nase in topic GA Review
2015 La Flèche Wallonne has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 6, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 La Flèche Wallonne/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 10:48, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
On it! Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:48, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Again, here just minor things:
- As with the Amstel Gold Race, you should move the citations out of the lead.
- Pre-race favourites: You should give Kwiatkowskis team.
- Final loops around Huy: You take the information that Gilbert looked sore from the source. I would say, that that is too much POV on the author's part and should probably taken out.
- Race finale: Same goes for the assertion that the break didn't have a chance at 12 km to go. That is mere speculation on the author's part and should not go into the article. I'm sure you can phrase it more neutral.
- Same as with Amstel Gold race, you should add a row with a source at the bottom of the UCI standings table.
That's about it :) Seven days on hold, I'm sure we'll be done a lot earlier! Zwerg Nase (talk) 17:27, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, Zwerg Nase. All done, I think. Relentlessly (talk) 21:04, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- Wonderful, it's a pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)