Talk:2015 Tour of Chongming Island World Cup

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 Tour of Chongming Island World Cup/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MPJ-DK (talk · contribs) 01:47, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

I will be picking up the review of this one - both for the Wiki Cup and the GA cup as well. I will be making my review comments over the next couple of days.

Side note, I would love some input on a couple of Featured List candidates, Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship and NWA World Historic Welterweight Championship. I am not asking for Quid pro Quo, but all help is appreciated.  MPJ-US  01:47, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

GA Toolbox

I like to get this checked out first, I have found issues using this that has led to quick fails so it's important this passes muster.

Peer review tool

• How about moving the picture of the winner up into the info box?

  It's not a picture of the race, so I don't think that would be appropriate. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Copyright violations Tool

• No problems Y

Disambiguation links

• No problems Y

External links

• The link "Chongming Island World Cup 2015" is dead

  Wayback Machine archive linked. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

• "Giorgia Bronzini Wins the Tour of Chongming Island World Cup!" - seems to not work either

  Ditto. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Well Written

• So the lead does not actually state that this is a cycling race, it's somethig the reader has to infer from the various references made

  Fixed. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

• "event, and a single-stage event" does not need the comma

  Fixed. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

• "years, and started" again no need for a comma

  Fixed. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

• "ninety degree" should be "ninety-degree"

  Fixed. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Sources/verifiable

• Is "velofocus" a reliable source?
• The rest look reliable etc.

Broad in coverage

• There is no follow up on the race, no reviews or opinions on the race? was it boring? Uneventful? did it make a different to the 2015 standings overall? Put it in perspective please.

Neutral

• No problems Y

Stable

• No problems Y

Illustrated / Images

• No problems Y

• @Harrias: - That's my complete review, not a ton of issues. I am putting the article on hold for up to 7 days to allow for updates to be made.  MPJ-US  02:05, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

• @Harrias: no activity in five days. If still nothing in 2 days i will have to fail it.  MPJ-US  17:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

MPJ-DK, Harrias has indicated that he's not going to be around much at present. I'll do my best to sort your concerns out, though it's possible I won't get to it in the next couple of days. Relentlessly (talk) 08:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

• Relentlessly - I would like to see some activity on this by tomorrow to justify keeping the review open.  MPJ-US  12:41, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
  • Sorry to hear there's such a rush, MPJ-DK. I'll need to do some research for some of it, but I've responded to what I could do immediately above. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
    • Relentlessly - I did not mean to imply it all had to be done, but it had sat inactive for a while and I wanted some activity at least to make sure this had not been forgotten.  MPJ-US  14:42, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

• Upon rereview I believe this is now a Good Article.  MPJ-US  18:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)