Talk:2015 United Kingdom general election in England
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Starting Page
editI have created for the very first time election page devoted is purely the results that will take place in England alone I believe that because of the rise of UKIP, the Greens and other smaller parties as support for the mainstream political parties waivers that England needs to have its own page to reflect this within this part of the United Kingdom! (MOTORAL1987 (talk) 13:40, 17 April 2015 (UTC))
No That would just duplicate the information on the main United Kingdom general election, 2015 page. - Arjayay (talk) 07:29, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Please read the main 2015 uk election talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.5.25.42 (talk) 08:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
New Info Box
editI've added a new info box for the upcoming general election within England to match the new info box that is on the main UK page. (46.65.97.8 (talk) 20:13, 5 May 2015 (UTC))
- Should we keep the ordinary infobox for this page though? AusLondonder (talk) 20:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- The 'new' one looks inappropriate for a FPTP election where there are only really three players. Also e should review the number of parties and whether Greens & Respect (poss. even UKIP) should be there. Cryptographic.2014 (talk) 21:22, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Should we keep the ordinary infobox for this page though? AusLondonder (talk) 20:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Table sorting
editPlease see Help talk:Sorting#Targets table refusing to sort. The table below is for this section of the article: United Kingdom general election, 2015 (England)#Target seats (the Conservative Party table). It can be used or adapted as a model for fixing the sorting in other tables in the article.
Conservative Party
Rank | Constituency | Region | Winning party 2010 |
Swing required (%) |
Result | Swing to CON (±%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Hampstead and Kilburn | London | Labour | 0.10 | Labour hold | -1.0 |
2 | Bolton West | North West England | Labour | 0.10 | Conservative gain | +0.9 |
3 | Solihull | West Midlands | Liberal Democrats | 0.16 | Conservative gain | +11.9 |
4 | Southampton Itchen | South East England | Labour | 0.22 | Conservative gain | +2.8 |
5 | Mid Dorset and North Poole | South West England | Liberal Democrats | 0.29 | Conservative gain | +11.6 |
6 | Wirral South | North West England | Labour | 0.66 | Labour hold | -4.8 |
7 | Derby North | East Midlands | Labour | 0.68 | Conservative gain | +0.8 |
8 | Wells | South West England | Liberal Democrats | 0.72 | Conservative gain | +7.4 |
9 | Dudley North | West Midlands | Labour | 0.84 | Labour hold | -4.7 |
10 | Great Grimsby | Yorkshire and the Humber | Labour | 1.08 | Labour hold | -5.7 |
A text editor's find-and-replace command speeds up fixing tables. --Timeshifter (talk) 16:29, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- Even Notepad (basic text editor that comes with Windows) will work. The replace command in the edit menu of Notepad. --Timeshifter (talk) 15:07, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on United Kingdom general election, 2015 (England). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150501022210/http://www.icmunlimited.com:80/data/media/pdf/2015_guardian_campaignpoll3.pdf to http://www.icmunlimited.com/data/media/pdf/2015_guardian_campaignpoll3.pdf
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150427111348/http://www.icmunlimited.com/data/media/pdf/2015_guardian_april_campaign2.pdf to http://www.icmunlimited.com/data/media/pdf/2015_guardian_april_campaign2.pdf
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150421053227/http://www.icmunlimited.com:80/data/media/pdf/2015_guardian_apr_campaign1.pdf to http://www.icmunlimited.com/data/media/pdf/2015_guardian_apr_campaign1.pdf
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150512024353/http://www.icmunlimited.com/data/media/pdf/2015_guardian_march15.pdf to http://www.icmunlimited.com/data/media/pdf/2015_guardian_march15.pdf
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150402105138/http://www.icmunlimited.com/data/media/pdf/2015_feb_guardian.pdf to http://www.icmunlimited.com/data/media/pdf/2015_feb_guardian.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://comres.co.uk/polls/Independent_Political_Poll_January_2015_34234.pdf - Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150403122241/http://www.icmunlimited.com/data/media/pdf/2015_jan_guardian_poll.pdf to http://www.icmunlimited.com/data/media/pdf/2015_jan_guardian_poll.pdf
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150101223134/http://www.icmunlimited.com/data/media/pdf/2014_dec_guardian_poll.pdf to http://www.icmunlimited.com/data/media/pdf/2014_dec_guardian_poll.pdf
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://comres.co.uk/polls/Independent_Political_Poll_16th_December_2014.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:56, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Add UKIP to infobox?
editConsidering UKIP won ~15% of the vote, ahead of the Liberal Democrats, they should be included. They do meet the threshold of being above 5% of the vote, and they did win a seat. DragonLegit04 (talk) 22:22, 17 March 2024 (UTC)