Talk:2015 Vuelta a España

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 Vuelta a España/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 08:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Glad to review this. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

An exquisitly written article on this year's Vuelta. I made several minor changes myself which leaves only minor things to do:

• The the last paragraph of the lead, I feel the wording should be slightly changed. At the moment it sounds like Valverde won the classification on the last stage alone. Maybe better: was decided during?
• Pre-race favorites: last paragraphs: I feel it is quite the generalized statement to assume that all sprinters were preparing for the WC.
• Caption for the stage 11 photo: It might have been the most difficult stage, but that is not an objective statement.
• Any chance for a source on the mountain points?

That's about it. Great work! I put it on hold for now. Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:58, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Zwerg Nase. How does that look? Relentlessly (talk) 20:51, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Excellent! Another one off the list :) Congrats! Zwerg Nase (talk) 22:27, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2015 Vuelta a España. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150824042421/http://www.teamsky.com/teamsky/home/article/63534 to http://www.teamsky.com/teamsky/home/article/63534

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)