Talk:2016 24 Hours of Daytona/GA1
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Tayi Arajakate in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 16:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hello MWright96, I'll be taking up the review for this nomination and will present it to you in some time. I hope you will find my feedback to be helpful. Tayi Arajakate Talk 16:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- MWright96, good work on the article, I've completed the review and could not find any significant issues. There are two minor ones which I have mentioned in the comments but otherwise this is more or less a good article so I've promoted it. Tayi Arajakate Talk 13:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Comments
edit- "It was the third consecutive year it was part of the WeatherTech SportsCar Championship and the 54th 24 Hours of Daytona." This line should have an inline citation.
- Since the information in the image caption under "Entry list" is not present in the article, the caption itself should have an inline citation.
Assessment
edit- Comprehension: The article is very well written.
- Verifiability:The article is verifiable.
- Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive enough.
- Neutrality: The article is neutral.
- Stability: The article is stable.
- Illustration: The article is well illustrated.
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (prose) | The prose is clear, concise and understandable. | Pass
|
| (b) (MoS) | The article is compliant with the manual of style. | Pass
|
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (references) | The article has a list of references and inline citation in the body, some minor issues exist. | Pass
|
| (b) (citations to reliable sources) | Sources used appear to be largely reliable. | Pass
|
| (c) (original research) | No original research found. | Pass
|
| (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) | No copyright violation or plagiarism found, note earwig's brings a number of false positive due to the names. | Pass
|
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (major aspects) | The article has a broad coverage of all major aspects. | Pass
|
| (b) (focused) | The article is focused without any unnecessary deviations. | Pass
|
Pass
| Notes | Result |
|---|---|
| The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view. | Pass
|
Pass
| Notes | Result |
|---|---|
| No ongoing edit warring or content disputes exist. | Pass
|
Pass
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | Images used are tagged with their appropriate copyright statuses. | Pass
|
| (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | Use and captions are appropriate and illustrative. | Pass
|