Talk:2016 Atlanta Braves season

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Season Summary

edit

The season summary section is a mess, there are no dates anywhere indicating what games are being referenced or when a summary of a new game is being started. Should be cleaned up or eliminated. Lincolning (talk) 22:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

The games in the season summary are all in chronological order. It's broken up with level 4 headers that represent each month. Each paragraph represents each series the Braves have played this season. It's not that hard to figure out.--Nascar king 00:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Seems more like a diary then a Wikipedia entry, but whatever. --Lincolning (talk) 15:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
It's written journalistically with each sentence acting as a lede.--Nascar king 16:24, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
If it was journalistic, it would include dates, among other things. --Lincolning (talk) 17:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Listing dates would be redundant because the games are all listed in chronological order.--Nascar king 17:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2016 Atlanta Braves season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)Reply