Talk:2016 E3 Harelbeke

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Zwerg Nase in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:2016 E3 Harelbeke/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 07:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply


I will review this. Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Some things left to do here:

  • At the end of the first paragraph, you need to make it clearer that Kwiatkowski is comparing himself a year before with Sagan when saying that it is "very difficult" with the pressure of the rainbow jersey.
  • You also need to make the expression "without legs" clearer. Maybe don't use the quote at all and rather paraphrase it.
  • Also, you use the word "said" too often in that section. Try to find some synonyms to make it a more enjoyable read.
  • The article could also use another photo, maybe one in the favorites section, or one of the eventual winner in the race summary or post-race section.

Sorry this took so long. I should be through all four reviews by tomorrow. On hold for now. Good job so far! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Since the nominator does not appear to be coming back, I have made the changes myself. Passed for GA. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)Reply