This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It would seem also that in addition to being the deadliest train accident in Africa in nine years, it is the deadliest train accident anywhere in the world this year so far (and, I would bet, it will turn out to be for the year as a whole_). Has any coverage noted this yet? Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It appears that the source of footnote 4 of aljazeera link to two different archives with the same url but with a different archive. See: here and here. The source needs to be arranged properly, at least by making two different sources but one would have a missing url. I think Al Jazeera may have corrected their information with the same url (probably because the initial information was eithor incorrect or misleading or updated). Please discuss.Continentaleurope (talk) 22:46, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
