Talk:2016 Marrakesh ePrix

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Bcschneider53 in topic GA Review
Good article2016 Marrakesh ePrix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star2016 Marrakesh ePrix is part of the 2016-17 Formula E season race reports series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 14, 2017Good article nomineeListed
February 26, 2020Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article


GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:2016 Marrakesh ePrix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bcschneider53 (talk · contribs) 00:31, 14 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

It's unbelievable an editor of your credentials has had to wait so long for a review. I'll take this on. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 00:31, 14 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Lead

edit

Background

edit

Practice and qualifying

edit
  • "The full course yellow was necessiated" Should "yellow" be changed to something like caution or safety car? Also, "necessitated".
  • "The driver who recorded the fastest time was awarded three points towards both championships." I suggest rewriting this to "The driver and team who recorded the fastest time were awarded three points towards their respective championships."
  • "the five drivers to qualify for the super pole round." Should "Super Pole" be capitalized as it is earlier in the section when it is first mentioned?

Post-race

edit
  • "saying both his vehicles were "amazing" and cars' balance was "really good"." An inline citation is required here for the quotes; I assume it is the "Driver Debrief" ref?

Classification

edit

As usual, simple fixes. Placing on hold. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 01:08, 14 May 2017 (UTC)Reply