This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The "Total" row always shows "100.00%", which is not what the percentages above sum to (except for the first row, which seems to be correct). It seems that the percentages listed above, for each choice, are correct, and are shown as a percent of the overall number of valid votes (37,040), which reflects the overall goal of a method that gets at least 50% support overall. Those subtotal percentages should then be added up to a total which shows what percent of votes were transferable to the given round. The "non-transferable" row should also be more clear, probably showing the running total of non-transferable votes, rather than what seems to be the newly-non-transferable votes, since .91+1.36+2.44+52.42+42.84 = 99.97 (== 100% with roundoff). ★NealMcB★ (talk) 13:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
