Talk:2016 Vermont gubernatorial election

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Live updating

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

@KoolKidMitch: As I wrote on your talk page, WP:Wikipedia is not news and WP:There is no deadline. It's really not our purpose to update all night long as unofficial polling data come in; the external link to live results at the bottom is enough to help out our readers.

But even if you disagree, it's against our "original research" policy to add your own evaluation of who is "most likely" to win without citing a reliable source. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a news outlet, and we should hold ourselves to a higher standard of patience and accuracy. FourViolas (talk) 00:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Issue with write-ins in primary

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks to the unnecessary live updating, we have unsourced write-in votes which will need to be fixed. I am leaving this here on the talk page as a reminder. The Vermont Secretary of State's office should have these totals available soon. ALPolitico (talk) 15:54, 11 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic