Talk:2016 in Brazil

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Elinruby in topic translator notes
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2016 in Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 29 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2016 in Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2016 in Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:13, 21 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2016 in Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

translator notes

edit

The Brazilian justice system is not a common law system and shares features with the French system, although the two are far from identical. Importantly however they share the concept of an investigating judge. This sometimes is translated as prosecutor, but in the Brazilian system the public minister is a closer equivalent. Special arrangements for what are called crimes of responsibility, a term for which I have not found a translation I like, but which covers crimes that are possible because of the position of the accused. The allegation that Dilma Rousseff altered government accounts to make the economy look better than it was is an example. These are tried by the Supreme Court if the Chamber of Deputies accepts a petion for impeachment and the Senate votes to impeach. I believe. This is not well-documented in Wikipedia articles. (Reason for the note) Only the Supreme Court can try a sitting president, and certain other government figures also can only be charged in this manner. Other courts deal with auditing government programs.

Sources that use pt=>en machine translation frequently refer to "award-winning" statements. This refers to the power of prosecutors to reduce sentences in view of cooperation given by witnesses. Another frequent translation strangeness is "mandate", which seems to specifically mean term in office or eligibility to hold that office. Stories crop up where politicians are removed from office and sometimes are barred for a time from seeking office again.Elinruby (talk) 11:42, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply