Talk:2017 Bangkok United F.C. season

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

Thailand Low‑importance

	Thailand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

March 2018 copy edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Would prefer to see more information in prose, such as a short text summary of the season. Similarly, the lead gives an introduction to the article rather than a summary, with no citations.
I feel there is gross overuse of flag icons. Please see MOS:FLAG. I removed the flags from the infobox MOS:INFOBOXFLAG which were particularly egregious. (You wouldn't put a flag for the nationality of the CEO and executives of a company, would you?)
I abbreviated some of the dates to tighten-up the spacing of the tables.
MOS discourages using an apostrophe as shorthand for distances in feet, as this is not universally understood. It seems like that information is tending toward trivia, though, and with no citations perhaps it should be removed altogether?

Short copy edit, so felt I should give some feedback. – Reidgreg (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply