...is totally wrong; I mean, this goes under Wikipedia:WikiProject Television and not Wikipedia:WikiProject Sports since the "competition" is fully amateur, contested by a people which are not even close to the real athletes, so it cannot meet any sports criteria. So, it needs to be written like a TV episode (Cast, synopsis, ratings etc.), and not using the tables for gold medals, silver medals, heavy statistics under every table etc. This is heavy WP:Original research and WP:Fancruft, so unless a good reason is provided to keep the tables and heavy statistics like in "Women archery" section (which is CLEARLY an original research; there are scores only for those parts which were broadcast, everything else is left blank), I will delete them in every of those ISAC articles and leave only a TV episode-like styling with cast, rating, presenters etc. only. Snowflake91 (talk) 18:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
- Snowflake91, for the statistic tables, you can remove it because I added it like as a research document for the future; only the people who watched, directly on the filming date / on the television on the broadcast day / the full videos on the internet after that, can know this results. But for the medal tables, it's the main part of the show and it's easy to search a lot of reliable sources for that. Like I wrote before, if it needs the cited sources, you can add a tag of additional resources for other editors can provide. Kenny htv (talk) 18:59, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
- This can be written as a prose in the "Synopsis" section and not with tables and statistics, for example: "In the women's archery event, GFriend took the gold medal after defeating EXID in the final *cited source*. Meanwhile in the men's event, xxx band won the gold medal, defeating yyy band in the final *source*." Snowflake91 (talk) 19:37, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
