This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Unfortunately, I'm afraid this will have to be a quick-fail. This earthquake occurred not more than two days ago, and information about the aftermath and long-term impact of the event (e.g. death toll, overall cost of damage, economic impact, political impact, historical/scientific significance, etc.) are still uncertain and currently omitted in the article since we simply don't know about them yet. At this time the article fails both criteria 3 (broad in its coverage) and 5 (stable) of the good article criteria as it is likely to change from day-to-day as a result of the recentness of the event and as more information becomes available.
I recommend waiting several months until the article is more stable and contains well-sourced information related to the long-term aftermath of the event before nominating to GA again. Mz7 (talk) 19:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
