Talk:2018 EFL League Two play-off final

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2018 EFL League Two play-off Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 16:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

I'll pick this one up. Will post review as soon as possible. Kosack (talk) 16:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Infobox

• Does "final" need capitalising in the infobox heading?
• Perhaps it's worth including the temperature mentioned in the summary in the weather field here? Hot and sunny seems a little informal.

Lead

• "The top three teams of the 2017–18 EFL League Two season gained automatic promotion to the Championship", think they've skipped a level there.
• "the teams placed from fourth to seventh place", slightly repetitive with the placed/place usage especially considering it's used two more times soon after. Perhaps simply drop the second use in this sentence?
• "After goalless first half" > a goalless?
• Use Paul Tisdale's full name and link in the third paragraph.

Route to the final

• "disallowed five minute"> five minutes

First half

• "but Jordan Storey's tackled on McNulty", a bit muddled here.
• "the half was brought to goalless end" > a goalless.

Second half

• "through Jordan Willis. Willis turned", slightly repetitive with the double use of Willis here.

References

• Refs are all well formatted and a quick spot check for accuracy comes back OK.

A couple of minor points to address above but a nice piece of work all in all. Placed on hold while these are looked at. Kosack (talk) 17:52, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Kosack lovely, thanks. I've addressed all these concerns now, please let me know if there's anything else. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 18:09, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Happy to promote. Kosack (talk) 06:19, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Statement Quality Predictions

Hi, Here are a few statements that were flagged as having POV issues by an AI. I'm posting these here for feedback and evaluation of the predictions. The related discussion can be found here. Each example contains the statement that was flagged by the AI as having minor POV issues along with the probability score of the prediction and the five possible words that led to the flagging. Note that all of the words will not be relevant but one of them is expected to be the reason for such flagging. The statements were taken from the article as on 29th November, 2020.

• the players have been magnificent his counterpart tisdale said in his post - match press conference that it wasn't the best performance two very good goals against us and really disappointed but also expressed pride in the club and its players for the season as a whole

Probability: 0.8661109

• this meant they progressed to the play - off final winning 5 2 on aggregate

Probability: 0.74741834

• described by the bbc ged scott as an exciting tussle which produced an ultimately fair result the match ended 1 1

Probability: 0.69774806

Noting that some of the flagged statements are in quotes, but I'm still posting them for feedback and have a conversation if the predictions make sense.

Pinging User:The_Rambling_Man regarding the update. We can discuss if a different format is more helpful after this initial posting. Sumit (talk) 21:33, 11 December 2020 (UTC)