Talk:2018 Masters (snooker)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Kosack in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:2018 Masters (snooker)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 20:44, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply


I'll take a look at this one, will post review as soon as possible. Kosack (talk) 20:44, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kosack, thanks for taking some time out and checking this one out. Let me know your feedback. I just did a quick copyedit on the article, as I realise I missed a few things - hope that's ok. Congratulations on the sysop bit, btw. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 21:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hi Lee, yeah that's no problem, less for me to review! Thanks for that. Here's my initial review:

Lead

edit

Tournament summary

edit
  • "A notable absentee was former Masters champion Neil Robertson", maybe point out he missed out by falling outside the top 16 (which is what I assume happened?)
    • He actually had to fall out of the top 17. He was ranked at 20 in the world prior to this tournament. Ironically, had the event been held at any other time of the season, Robertson would have made the cut. I've made a slight rewording Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:39, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

First round

edit
  • "Playing in his first Masters tournament in eight years", was this sentence meant to be connected to the one before it?
  • "Kyren Wilson had his first victory in a Masters match", had seems a little clunky here I think. Secured, claimed or something similar perhaps?
  • All of the first round matches are mentioned here apart from Higgins/McGill. Is that deliberate?
Good point but with only eight matches it seems odd to exclude one. Plus, Higgins features fairly often after that so it helps the time line I think. Kosack (talk) 19:08, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Quarter-finals

edit
  • Do we know what the crowd was doing to antagonise Allen so much?
Ok, no worries. Kosack (talk) 19:08, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Coverage

edit

References

edit
  • Ref 22 is the Daily Star which is a bit questionable as a reliable source. Any chance of replacing that with something else?
Yeah, the information isn't particularly difficult to source. The BBC ref says the same thing. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Ref 35 runs afoul of WP:ALLCAPS so drop the title to normal case.
Worldsnooker.com does this all the time. Bane of my referencing. Fixed. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Other than that, the refs are formatted immaculately.

Nice article overall, very little to complain about. Placed on hold for now until the above issues are addressed. Kosack (talk) 10:09, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your quick review, Kosack, I've made most of the changes above, I hope this is suitable. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 16:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Nice work, I'm happy with the changes made and this article meets the necessary criteria for GA in my opinion. Happy to promote. Kosack (talk) 19:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply