Talk:2019 Tristan da Cunha general election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Africa: Saint Helena Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Saint Helena work group.

British Overseas Territories Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Update

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

It seem the local website has updated the election results with votes per candidates. :) --Aréat (talk) 05:59, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Aréat: Thanks! I've udpated the article. However, I think there may be an error in the number of votes Clive Glass received (188) given that there were only 158 votes cast (I know in some systems you can cast multiple votes for one candidate, but not sure it's possible here). I suspect it should be 118, but have contacted the webmaster to check. Number 5 7 11:56, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Aréat: Just heard back from them and I was right. They gave me a link to a different source (the certified results – which still has an error as their turnout percentage is wrong). Number 5 7 17:05, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

That was fast! Thanks for checking it. --Aréat (talk) 17:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic