Talk:2019 World Athletics Championships – Women's marathon/GA1

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: BennyOnTheLoose (talk · contribs) 12:08, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
    Checked all results above 4% match on Earwig's Copyvio tool - no concerns.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit

I'm happy to discuss or be challenged on any of my comments.

  • Suggest using IA bot or a similar tool to prevent WP:LINKROT
  • Consider adding a short description (WP:SHORTDESC) if a useful one is possible. It looks like some other GAs on similar topics don't have one.
  • Lead / Preview: "six laps of a 7-kilometre (4.3 mi) floodlit course" doesn't quite make the marathon distance. I suggest either confirming the "exact" route distance or adding in a qualifier along the lines of "approximately"
  • Preview: "considered the favourites" - consider adding "to win." I'm not sure how widely understood favourite in the betting sense is, but there must be a small possibility of confusion with favourite.
  • Preview: "Entrants highlighted from other countries.." - true, but the highlight is in a particular IAAF article. Could perhaps be reworded as something like "Other competitors included Lonah Salpeter of Israel [something about Euro 10,000] and Helalia Johannes of Namibia [something about Commonwealth title]."
  • Summary: "The race was officially scheduled to start at 23:59 local time.." - consider reword to show that it did start at that (scheduled) time, which I don't think is explicit at the moment. (On the other hand, there is nothing that says it did not start at that time.)
  • Source 1 (IAAF qualifying)   (Note: For some reason the link on the article page didn't work for me - I found the article via Google, and the link seems to be as per citation)
  • Source 2 (IAAF qualifying system)  
  • Source 3 (Kelly)  
  • Source 4 (Rehmat)  
  • Source 5 (Bloom)  
  • Source 6 (Cacciola)  
  • Source 7 (Rowbottom)  (Note: IAAF changed its name to World Athletics after the Doha event)
  • Source 8 (British Athletics)  
  • Source 9 (Gabelić)  
  • Source 10 (IAAF records) - additional citation needed for "not expected that any records would be set"  
  • Source 11 (IAAF)  
  • Source 12 (Al Jazeera)  
  • Source 13 (Keating)  
  • Source 14 (Chowdhury)  
  • Source 15 (Tress)  
  • Source 16 (Bloom 2)  
  • Source 17 (IAAF - 50km)  
  • Source 18 (IAAF Results)  

Harrias Thanks for your work on this interesting article. I've made a few suggestions, and am always happy to engage in discussion. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:11, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

@BennyOnTheLoose: Cheers for the review. I think I've wrapped up these points now; any further input would be greatly appreciated. Harrias talk 13:34, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Harrias: Thanks for your responses. I'm happy to pass this for GA. I'd still be in favour of running IA bot or another archiving tool, but that's not a necessity. I made a couple of further minor changes to the preview section but would have no objections to these being reverted or amended. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 17:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply